|
SAFER's Mason Tvert calls for boycott of Starbucks, alleged sponsor of group backing restrictive medical marijuana laws |
SAFER's Mason Tvert calls for boycott of Starbucks, alleged sponsor of group backing restrictive medical marijuana laws By Michael Roberts in Follow That Story, Marijuana Thu., Jan. 21 2010 @ 9:31AM Apparently, caffeine isn't Mason Tvert's favorite stimulant. Hardly a day goes by without Mason Tvert, head of SAFER (Safer Alternative For Enjoyable Recreation), going after some individual or institution standing in the way of legalizing marijuana use for adults in Colorado and beyond. Still, his latest target is a surprise: Starbucks, the ubiquitous peddler of a highly addictive substance -- coffee. Why? According to a manifesto on SAFER's website, "The Colorado Drug Investigators Association (CDIA), the group spearheading anti-marijuana lobbying efforts, is sponsored by several local and national businesses including Starbucks Coffee, Glock handguns, and -- you guessed it -- members of the alcohol industry!" With this in mind, Tvert is staging a news conference at a Denver Starbucks at noon today, calling for a boycott of the chain until it disassociates itself from the CDIA. But don't rest easy, gun-packers and booze manufacturers. He may be coming after you next. Get details about the press conference below: Marijuana reform backers to boycott Starbucks Coffee nationwide until it withdraws sponsorship of law enforcement group lobbying to keep marijuana illegal and protect the "Arrest and Prosecution Industry" WHAT: News conference to announce the marijuana reform movement's nationwide boycott of Starbucks and other businesses until they withdraw their sponsorships of the Colorado Drug Investigators Association, a group of law enforcement officials lobbying against the establishment of a regulated system of medical marijuana dispensaries so they can continue arresting and prosecuting people for marijuana WHEN: TODAY, Thursday, January 21, 12 p.m. WHERE: In front of the Starbucks located at 300 E. 6th Avenue, Denver (NE corner of Grant St. and 6th Ave.) WHO: Mason Tvert, SAFER executive director and coauthor of Marijuana Is Safer: So Why are We Driving People to Drink? Statement from Mason Tvert "According to a recent report in The Denver Post, state and federal law enforcement officials have been meddling in Colorado's legislative process, lobbying for measures that would shut down every medical marijuana dispensary in order to protect their industry of arresting and prosecuting marijuana users and producers. "About 65 percent of Coloradans want to regulate medical marijuana dispensaries and create new legitimate, state-licensed businesses with hundreds of new taxpaying employees. The Colorado Drug Investigators Association wants to ban these new businesses so its members can continue spending taxpayer money to arrest and prosecute people involved with medical marijuana. "It's no surprise that law enforcement organizations and their leaders -- whose jobs are dependent on maintaining the war on marijuana -- are lobbying to kill state-licensed medical marijuana dispensaries. But Starbucks and other companies' funding of this war should strike any marijuana consumer or reform supporter as truly appalling. It's time to stand up and send them all a message. "Our call for a boycott went out late last night and our supporters have already sent hundreds of e-mails to Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, letting him know we will keep pushing for this boycott -- and will ask other marijuana policy reform organizations to join us -- until Starbucks disassociates itself from the Colorado Drug Investigators Association. "We won't be giving our bucks to Starbucks until it stops giving its bucks to the Arrest and Prosecution Industry's war on marijuana." |
|
LA Police Chief Says Collectives Don?t Attract Crime |
January 18th, 2010 Posted by Don Duncan
Chief Beck with LA Mayor
Los Angeles Police Department Chief Charlie Beck told reporters at the Daily News that medical cannabis collectives do not attract crime, adding that “Banks are more likely to get robbed than medical marijuana dispensaries.” The Los Angeles City Council should consider the Chief’s words carefully as they make final decisions about regulations for hundreds of patients’ associations in the city on Tuesday. If adopted as written, the ordinance may make finding a suitable location almost impossible.
Responding the concern from Neighborhood Councils, law enforcement, and the media, the City Attorney and Councilmembers have created tough location restrictions for collectives. Collectives cannot be adjacent to, across the street from, or across an ally from any residential use. The Council will decide on Tuesday if the facilities should be 500 or 1,000 feet from a laundry list of sensitive uses – schools, public parks, public libraries, religious institutions, licensed child care facilities, youth centers, substance abuse rehabilitation centers, or other medical cannabis collectives.
Even the best case scenario under the proposed regulations is not good news for patients in Los Angeles. Most of the city’s collectives will be forced to close, and it is unlikely many will find a new property that meets the tough requirements. One solution may be to allow a “Good Neighbor” exception for any collective that has not been the subject of community complaints. That would let conscientious collectives stay in their existing location and avoid an interruption in service for patients.
We will find out on Tuesday if the City Council hears Chief Beck’s analysis and adopts rules that treat collectives like health care facilities with a proven track record as good neighbors, or like public nuisances. Patients and advocates hope cooler heads will prevail.
The Los Angeles City council meets at 10:00 AM on Tuesday, January 19, in Room 340 at City Hall. |
|
|
Scandal at the Marijuana Policy Project |
Scandal at the Marijuana Policy Project
by Bean
Thu, Jan 14, 2010 11:29 pm
By David Bienenstock and Richard Cusick
As part of an ongoing investigation, HIGH TIMES magazine has confirmed that at least seven full-time staff members of the Washington, DC based Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) have quit their jobs in protest of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct by MPP Executive Director Rob Kampia, which took place following an informal staff “happy hour” in August of 2009.
News Source |
|
BILL TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA ADVANCES THROUGH ASSEMBLY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE |
|
BILL TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA ADVANCES THROUGH ASSEMBLY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
In a historic vote, a panel of California lawmakers Tuesday approved legislation to tax and regulate marijuana sales similar to how alcohol is sold.
But even while celebrating its passage, supporters of the bill acknowledged it would not become law this year.
Still, Stephen Gutwillig, California director of the Drug Policy Alliance, a pro-legalization group, called the vote the beginning of the end for marijuana prohibition in the country.
"This is not only the first time any legislative body in the nation has formally addressed ending decades of failed marijuana prohibition, but also actually voted to end it," he said.
The Assembly's public safety committee passed the bill 4-3 on Tuesday.
The committee's vice chairman, Assemblyman Curt Hagman, R-Chino Hills, called the legislation one of the worst bills he has seen the committee pass.
"It is astonishing in this day and age we could pass something this bad. It is a good sign of how far liberal this Legislature has become," he said.
He blamed liberal members of the committee - four Bay Area Democrats - - for the bill's advancement.
But for the bill to go further, it would have to pass the health committee before Friday. That is considered an unlikely scenario, considering debate has not been scheduled.
The legislation would allow adults 21 and older to legally possess, grow and sell marijuana. The state would charge a $50-per-ounce fee and a 9 percent tax on retail sales.
The end result could be a rise in cost to end users. Typically an ounce of marijuana retails for between $300 and $400. Taxes like those proposed by the bill's author, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, could add an additional $100 to purchases of an ounce.
"What happens as a result is that the very poorest are the most directly affected," said Phil Morris, director of the Canto Diem Medical Marijuana Collective in Los Angeles. "Many collectives don't have the cash flow to absorb increased fees."
State tax collectors have estimated the legislation would produce up to $1.4 billion in annual revenues - $990 million from the $50 per ounce fee and $392 million in sales tax revenue.
Under the bill, much of that money would go to fund drug-abuse education and prevention programs.
"A big group of people is saying that this will help the state budget, but the tax goes directly to rehab programs and state education," Hagman said.
Rather than generating revenue, Hagman said it would cost the state through increased health care expenses and the costs of combatting what he said was an inevitable black market for drugs.
"I don't think we have all thought through the consequences of this legislation," he said.
Assemblyman Anthony Adams, R-Claremont, agreed.
"The suggestion that we should take illegal activities and make them legal for the purposes of attaching fees and penalties so the state can make more money is absurd," he said. "At what point do we legalize prostitution because it has fundraising potential?"
But the manager of a planned medical-marijuana dispensary in South El Monte said legalization could be an economic stimulus for the state, from production of fertilizers to plastic bottles.
"It could give a lot of people legitimate jobs," said Monica Cress, the manager of San Gabriel Valley Compassionate Care.
And Gutwillig said momentum is moving in the direction of legalization. He called 2009 a watershed year in the once marginalized movement.
"Gov. Schwarzenegger called for a debate on marijuana legalization; we saw the carnage in Mexico spilling across the border; and the tanking of the state and national economies really put wasteful policies like marijuana prohibition on the table for the first time," he said.
If the bill does die, a spokesman for Ammiano said the assemblyman would hold off on reintroducing legislation until after the November election, which could feature a marijuana legalization ballot proposition.
Oakland medical-marijuana entrepreneur Richard Lee, the initiative's main backer, has said supporters have far more than the necessary 434,000 signatures needed to qualify for the ballot.
The Tax and Regulate Cannabis 2010 campaign is expected to submit those signatures for approval later this month.
The ballot measure is more narrow than the Ammiano bill. It would legalize recreational marijuana under limited circumstances.
Although a Field Poll last April found that 56 percent of Californians would support legalizing marijuana for recreational use, Gutwillig said the initiative's passage is hardly a sure thing.
Instead, 2012 may be a more hospitable year for such a proposal, with more young voters heading to the polls for a presidential election.
Whether the ballot initiative advances, or another legislative vote occurs later this year, Gutwillig said Tuesday's vote should not be understated.
"It sends the signal throughout the country that serious people take this issue seriously," he said. "It is clear that there is more stomach in Sacramento than anyone thought for discussion of this crucial issue and its fiscal impacts on the state." |
|